Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Palm 2

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #19 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 75.1 to 25.6.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.7Palm 2
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index58.330.0
Released2026-04-14—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked6610

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
LMArena Coding1518994
SWE-bench Verified83.5%—
FrontierCode38.5%—
LMArena WebDev1558—
SciCode54.5%—
GSO44.1%—
WeirdML76.4%—
MirrorCode31.1%—
ALE-Bench1,323—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10), Palm 2: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents49.2%—
OSWorld 2.018.2%—
τ²-bench Banking40.2%—
PostTrainBench28.6%—
ExploitBench26.5%—
GBAEval43.8%—
GDP.pdf21%—
LMArena Search1233—
Vending-Bench 210,937—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts15061005
ARC-AGI-275.8%—
SimpleBench61.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)39%—
ARC-AGI-193.5%—
CritPt12%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Thematic Generalization72.8%—
EBR-Bench19%—
Mystery Game Puzzles28%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA52.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.25—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
LMArena Math14991049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)70.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions73.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench54%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)43.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)22.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23), Palm 2: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
GPQA Diamond90.2%—
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%—
SimpleQA Verified51.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
LMArena Expert1521—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38), Palm 2: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
LMArena Vision1316—
Blueprint-Bench 224.5%—
Furniture Assembly33.3%—
LMArena Document1495—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
LMArena Non-English1480916
LMArena Chinese1531887
LMArena French1503—
LMArena German1495—
LMArena Japanese1472—
LMArena Korean1464—
LMArena Russian1494—
LMArena Spanish1495—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14981010

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
LMArena Longer Query15051010

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Palm 2
LMArena Text14901027
LMArena Creative Writing1486991
LMArena Multi-Turn1505994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1914—
EQ-Bench 41311—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Palm 2?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Palm 2 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper