Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Hy3

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 43× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.4

Rank #17 Confirmed

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Hy3 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.5 to 37.4.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.7Hy3
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index58.443.6
Released2026-04-142026-07-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$5$0.13
Output $ / M tokens$25$0.53
Results tracked6617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 59.9 (#10), Hy3: 46.6 (#60)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena WebDev15571509
LMArena Coding15191465
SWE-bench Verified83.5%—
FrontierCode38.5%—
SciCode54.5%—
GSO44.1%—
WeirdML76.4%—
MirrorCode31.1%—
ALE-Bench1,323—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#8), Hy3: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents49.2%—
OSWorld 2.018.2%—
τ²-bench Banking40.2%—
PostTrainBench28.6%—
ExploitBench26.5%—
GBAEval43.8%—
GDP.pdf21%—
LMArena Search1233—
Vending-Bench 210,937—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 53.7 (#24), Hy3: 25.0 (#134)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
NYT Connections (extended)39%41.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts15071449
ARC-AGI-275.8%—
SimpleBench61.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%—
ARC-AGI-193.5%—
CritPt12%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Thematic Generalization72.8%—
EBR-Bench19%—
Mystery Game Puzzles28%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA52.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.39—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 66.5 (#20), Hy3: 37.4 (#98)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Math14991475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)70.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions73.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench54%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)43.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)22.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#20), Hy3: 40.2 (#108)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Expert15211461
GPQA Diamond90.2%—
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%—
SimpleQA Verified51.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 41.5 (#29), Hy3: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Vision1317—
Blueprint-Bench 224.5%—
Furniture Assembly33.3%—
LMArena Document1495—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 57.5 (#9), Hy3: 53.7 (#60)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Non-English14811427
LMArena Chinese15301496
LMArena French15051461
LMArena Korean14661390
LMArena Russian14941435
LMArena Spanish14971448
LMArena German1494—
LMArena Japanese1472—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 78.6 (#9), Hy3: 75.3 (#68)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Instruction Following14981425

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 46.1 (#24), Hy3: 44.1 (#70)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Longer Query15051443

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 75.3 (#8), Hy3: 62.5 (#75)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Text14911442
LMArena Creative Writing14861399
LMArena Multi-Turn15061436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1914—
EQ-Bench 41311—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Hy3?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 43× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.7 lists at $5 and $25.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Hy3 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.9 versus 46.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.7 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Hy3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper