Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs InternVL2-40B

Claude Opus 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#20); InternVL2-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

58.2

Rank #20 Confirmed

InternVL2-40B Shanghai AI Lab

36.6

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Claude Opus 4.6 leads 37.3 to 33.7.
  • InternVL2-40B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.6 and InternVL2-40B specifications
Claude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
ProviderAnthropicShanghai AI Lab
Noometry Index58.236.6
Released2026-02-042024-07-08
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked681

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 57.2 (#20), InternVL2-40B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
SWE-bench Verified78.7%—
FrontierCode26.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.6%—
LMArena WebDev1547—
SWE-bench Multilingual72%—
GSO41.2%—
WeirdML78%—
LMArena Coding1536—
ALE-Bench996.5—
AlgoTune1.47—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 51.1 (#4), InternVL2-40B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
Terminal-Bench79.8%—
APEX-Agents46.3%—
Remote Labor Index4.2%—
τ²-bench Banking27.3%—
Cybench93%—
DeepResearch Bench55.3%—
GBAEval44.1%—
LMArena Search1253—
METR Time Horizons78.9%—
Vending-Bench 28,018—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 57.8 (#23), InternVL2-40B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
ARC-AGI-269.2%—
SimpleBench67.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.1%—
ARC-AGI-194%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
EnigmaEval7.6%—
Thematic Generalization80.6%—
EBR-Bench12.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1527—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA55.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.24—
ForecastBench60—

Math Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 63.0 (#31), InternVL2-40B: —

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 61.9 (#26), InternVL2-40B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
GPQA Diamond90.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam34.4%—
SimpleQA Verified47%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.2%—
LMArena Expert1546—

Multimodal Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Claude Opus 4.6: 37.3 (#74), InternVL2-40B: 33.7

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
LMArena Vision1316—
Video-MME—61.2%
Furniture Assembly28.3%—
LMArena Document1507—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 57.9 (#6), InternVL2-40B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
LMArena Non-English1489—
LMArena Chinese1551—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena German1502—
LMArena Japanese1484—
LMArena Korean1464—
LMArena Russian1497—
LMArena Spanish1510—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 79.5 (#4), InternVL2-40B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
LMArena Instruction Following1523—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 48.1 (#13), InternVL2-40B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
CL-bench20.7%—
CL-bench Life17%—
LMArena Longer Query1520—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 73.5 (#10), InternVL2-40B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6InternVL2-40B
LMArena Text1503—
LMArena Creative Writing1505—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1809—
EQ-Bench 41223—
LMArena Multi-Turn1513—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than InternVL2-40B?

Claude Opus 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#20); InternVL2-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.6 and InternVL2-40B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.6 has 68 scored results on Noometry and InternVL2-40B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper