Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs INTELLECT-1

Claude Opus 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#18); INTELLECT-1 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #18 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.6 and INTELLECT-1 specifications
Claude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
ProviderAnthropicHugging Face
Noometry Index58.3—
Released2026-02-042024-11-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked687

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 57.7 (#15), INTELLECT-1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
SWE-bench Verified78.7%—
FrontierCode26.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.6%—
LMArena WebDev1546—
SWE-bench Multilingual72%—
GSO41.2%—
WeirdML78%—
LMArena Coding1535—
ALE-Bench996.5—
AlgoTune1.47—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 51.0 (#4), INTELLECT-1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
Terminal-Bench79.8%—
APEX-Agents46.3%—
Remote Labor Index4.2%—
τ²-bench Banking27.3%—
Cybench93%—
DeepResearch Bench55.3%—
GBAEval44.1%—
LMArena Search1253—
METR Time Horizons78.9%—
Vending-Bench 28,018—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 57.7 (#21), INTELLECT-1: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
Epoch Capabilities Index155.36100.38
ARC-AGI-269.2%—
SimpleBench67.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.1%—
ARC-AGI-194%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
EnigmaEval7.6%—
Thematic Generalization80.6%—
EBR-Bench12.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1527—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA55.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard—34.9%
ForecastBench60—
HellaSwag—71.4%
WinoGrande—65.8%

Math Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 62.7 (#25), INTELLECT-1: —

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 61.8 (#23), INTELLECT-1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
GPQA Diamond90.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam34.4%—
SimpleQA Verified47%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.2%—
LMArena Expert1546—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—54.5%
MMLU—49.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 37.0 (#67), INTELLECT-1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly28.3%—
LMArena Document1507—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 58.2 (#4), INTELLECT-1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
LMArena Non-English1490—
LMArena Chinese1551—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena German1504—
LMArena Japanese1484—
LMArena Korean1465—
LMArena Russian1497—
LMArena Spanish1512—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 79.7 (#3), INTELLECT-1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
LMArena Instruction Following1523—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 48.1 (#13), INTELLECT-1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
CL-bench20.7%—
CL-bench Life17%—
LMArena Longer Query1520—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.6: 73.7 (#9), INTELLECT-1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6INTELLECT-1
LMArena Text1504—
LMArena Creative Writing1506—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1809—
EQ-Bench 41223—
LMArena Multi-Turn1514—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than INTELLECT-1?

Claude Opus 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#18); INTELLECT-1 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.6 and INTELLECT-1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.6 has 68 scored results on Noometry and INTELLECT-1 has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper