Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)

Claude Opus 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.5 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic

50.5

Rank #39 Confirmed

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) Google

32.9

Rank #240 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher in 9 categories and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Opus 4.5 leads 56.4 to 26.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 86.1% for Claude Opus 4.5 and 16.3% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024).

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) specifications
Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index50.532.9
Released2025-11-012024-05-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked6942

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 55.4 (#21), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 33.9 (#233)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
WeirdML63.7%24.9%
LMArena Coding15041262
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)76.8%—
LMArena WebDev1493—
SWE-bench Multilingual70.7%—
GSO26.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.1%
ALE-Bench1,025—
AlgoTune1.77—
HumanEval+—75.6%
MBPP+—67.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 47.2 (#11), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.3 (#97)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
BALROG43.5%14.6%
Terminal-Bench63.1%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard77.5%—
GDPval45.5%—
Remote Labor Index3.8%—
τ²-bench Airline84%—
τ²-bench Banking24.7%—
τ²-bench Retail79.6%—
τ²-bench Telecom92.3%—
Cybench82%—
DeepResearch Bench54.8%—
OSWorld66.3%—
LMArena Search1180—
METR Time Horizons75%—
Vending-Bench 24,967—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 42.5 (#43), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 20.8 (#212)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Hard Prompts14761257
DTBench89.9%53.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index150.1129.37
ForecastBench60.753.9
ARC-AGI-237.6%—
SimpleBench62%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)52.5%—
ARC-AGI-180%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval11.9%—
EBR-Bench14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles22%—
LMCA44.5%—
PIQA—87.5%

Math Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 38.5 (#85), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 20.8 (#274)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.1%16.3%
LMArena Math14631269
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)20.7%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)34.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
ProofBench36%—
Omni-MATH—30.4%
MATH Level 5—61.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—
GSM8K—82.4%

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 56.4 (#38), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#253)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
GPQA Diamond86%47.3%
LMArena Expert14881233
Humanity's Last Exam25.2%—
SimpleQA Verified45.7%—
MMLU-Pro—67.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.9%—
GPQA (HELM)—43.7%
BoolQ—85.8%
MMLU—77.9%

Multimodal Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 31.1 (#99), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 35.3 (#76)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
GeoBench75%76%
LMArena Vision—1141
Video-MME—70.3%
VPCT40%—
Furniture Assembly28.3%—
LMArena Document1462—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 54.5 (#45), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 43.1 (#184)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Non-English14381278
LMArena Chinese14701295
LMArena French14711257
LMArena German14491262
LMArena Japanese14151252
LMArena Korean14241220
LMArena Russian14481288
LMArena Spanish14551242

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 77.7 (#20), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 67.0 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Instruction Following14781258
IFEval—83.1%

Long Context Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 46.4 (#21), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#182)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Longer Query14801284
CL-bench21.1%—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.5 leads

Claude Opus 4.5: 68.2 (#28), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.9 (#190)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Text14511287
LMArena Creative Writing14451285
LMArena Multi-Turn14661253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1687—
WildBench—79.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)?

Claude Opus 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.5 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.4 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.5 has 69 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper