Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Claude Opus 4.1 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.0 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 32K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $75 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1479 | 1361 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | — |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 674.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.34 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 38% | — |
| GDPval | 43.6% | — |
| Cybench | 42% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1148 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.8% | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1374 |
| SimpleBench | 60% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 7.2% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 7.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 37.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.12 | — |
| ForecastBench | 62 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1359 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 12.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 7.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1339 |
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| VPCT | 35% | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1431 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1422 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1435 | 1344 |
Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1412 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1387 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Claude Opus 4.1 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.0 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.