Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5.3 Chat
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and GPT-5.3 Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 38.2 to 22.3.
- GPT-5.3 Chat is cheaper at $1.75 / $14 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $75 for Claude Opus 4.1.
- Claude Opus 4.1 accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 42.8 |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | 2026-03-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 128K |
| Max output | 32K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | $1.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $75 | $14 |
| Results tracked | 48 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1479 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | — |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 674.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.34 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), GPT-5.3 Chat: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 38% | — |
| GDPval | 43.6% | — |
| Cybench | 42% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1148 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.8% | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1399 |
| SimpleBench | 60% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 7.2% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 7.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 37.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.12 | — |
| ForecastBench | 62 | — |
Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1389 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 12.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 7.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1397 |
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), GPT-5.3 Chat: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| VPCT | 35% | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | 1431 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1384 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | 1352 |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1422 | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1371 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1435 | 1378 |
Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1396 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1412 | 1355 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1412 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.7% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1690 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than GPT-5.3 Chat?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-5.3 Chat?
GPT-5.3 Chat is cheaper. It lists at $1.75 per million input tokens and $14 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.1 lists at $15 and $75.
Is Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-5.3 Chat better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Opus 4.1 does, with 200K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.3 Chat share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Chat has 18.