Model comparison

Claude Mythos Preview vs GLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#38); Claude Mythos Preview does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Mythos Preview Anthropic

40.8

Unranked Sparse

GLM-5.2 Z.ai (Zhipu)

50.9

Rank #38 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Claude Mythos Preview leads 41.1 to 31.6.
  • GLM-5.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Mythos Preview and GLM-5.2 specifications
Claude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index40.850.9
Released2026-04-072026-06-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked250

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GLM-5.2: 50.9 (#37)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
SWE-bench Verified—78.7%
DeepSWE—43.8%
FrontierCode—24.5%
LMArena WebDev—1604
SciCode—50.5%
WeirdML—70.1%
LMArena Coding—1484
ALE-Bench—1,047

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Mythos Preview leads

Claude Mythos Preview: 41.1, GLM-5.2: 31.6 (#63)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—31.7%
ExploitBench73.8%—
GBAEval—0%
METR Time Horizons85.2%—
Vending-Bench 2—8,314

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GLM-5.2: 42.1 (#46)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
ARC-AGI-2—22.8%
SimpleBench—58.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.3%
ARC-AGI-1—77%
CritPt—20.9%
Chess Puzzles—21%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1480
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—93.6%
LMCA—45.8%
Surface Evolver Bench—55.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.76

Math Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GLM-5.2: 55.4 (#35)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—59.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.4%
ProofBench—35%
LMArena Math—1482

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GLM-5.2: 57.1 (#36)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
GPQA Diamond—91.9%
SimpleQA Verified—34.2%
LMArena Expert—1484

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GLM-5.2: 56.0 (#25)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
LMArena Non-English—1459
LMArena Chinese—1518
LMArena French—1476
LMArena German—1470
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1445
LMArena Russian—1467
LMArena Spanish—1477

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GLM-5.2: 77.1 (#32)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
LMArena Instruction Following—1465

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GLM-5.2: 45.3 (#43)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
LMArena Longer Query—1479

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GLM-5.2: 70.7 (#20)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGLM-5.2
LMArena Text—1470
LMArena Creative Writing—1465
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1757
EQ-Bench 4—1222
LMArena Multi-Turn—1468

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Mythos Preview better than GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#38); Claude Mythos Preview does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Mythos Preview and GLM-5.2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Mythos Preview has 2 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.2 has 50.

Related comparisons

Go deeper