Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Qwen2-72B

Qwen2-72B has enough public results to be ranked (#300); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2-72B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2-72B leads 23.2 to 19.6.
  • Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Qwen2-72B specifications
Claude InstantQwen2-72B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.530.0
Released2023-08-092024-06-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked726

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
LMArena Coding—1196
BigCodeBench Complete—54%
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Claude Instant: 19.6, Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28125.28
LMArena Hard Prompts—1191
DTBench45.8%—

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
LMArena Math—1235
MATH Level 5—39.1%
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
MMLU73.4%82.4%
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
LMArena Expert—1171
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English—1176
LMArena Chinese—1240
LMArena French—1170
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Russian—1169
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following—1181

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query—1192

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantQwen2-72B
LMArena Text—1203
LMArena Creative Writing—1181
LMArena Multi-Turn—1196

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B has enough public results to be ranked (#300); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Qwen2-72B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper