Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Mistral Small 3.1

Mistral Small 3.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#269); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
  • Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Claude InstantMistral Small 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index29.531.7
Released2023-08-092025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked728

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding—1309
HumanEval+50.6%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Claude Instant: 19.6, Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28127.48
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1278
DTBench45.8%—

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%
LMArena Math—1262
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%
LMArena Expert—1257
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English—1255
LMArena Chinese—1253
LMArena French—1273
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1283

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
IFEval—75%
LMArena Instruction Following—1264

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query—1299

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text—1277
LMArena Creative Writing—1253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1270

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Mistral Small 3.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#269); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper