Model comparison
Claude Instant vs Llama 13b
Llama 13b has enough public results to be ranked (#344); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 1 category and Llama 13b in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Instant leads 18.8 to 13.4.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 23.9 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Reasoning Claude Instant leads
Claude Instant: 18.8, Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.2 | 100.09 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 86.7% | 20.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | 52.7% |
| MMLU | 73.4% | 47.7% |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | 77.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than Llama 13b?
Llama 13b has enough public results to be ranked (#344); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Llama 13b share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.