Model comparison
Claude Instant vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Granite 4.0 H Small has enough public results to be ranked (#213); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 23.4 to 18.8.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1247 |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Claude Instant: 18.8, Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1240 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1244 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | — |
| MMLU | 73.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1250 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1198 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 89% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1221 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1240 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1210 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1243 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Granite 4.0 H Small has enough public results to be ranked (#213); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.