Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#19); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

28.8

Unranked Sparse

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.8

Rank #19 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.3 to 18.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 97.3% for Grok 4.6.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Grok 4.6 specifications
Claude InstantGrok 4.6
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index28.856.8
Released2023-08-092026-08-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked749

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1620
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
LMArena Coding—1464
ALE-Bench—1,508
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Claude Instant: 18.8, Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
DTBench45.8%97.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.2156.48
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1445
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
LMCA—48.5%

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%
LMArena Math—1416
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%
LMArena Expert—1463
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1265
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English—1422
LMArena Chinese—1479
LMArena French—1458
LMArena German—1425
LMArena Japanese—1383
LMArena Korean—1395
LMArena Russian—1427
LMArena Spanish—1408

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following—1431

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query—1453

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.6
LMArena Text—1427
LMArena Creative Writing—1430
LMArena Multi-Turn—1422

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#19); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Grok 4.6 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper