Model comparison

Claude Instant vs GPT-4.1 mini

GPT-4.1 mini has enough public results to be ranked (#240); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

GPT-4.1 mini OpenAI

33.6

Rank #240 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.1 mini in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Instant leads 19.6 to 10.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 68.8% for GPT-4.1 mini.

Side by side

Claude Instant and GPT-4.1 mini specifications
Claude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index29.533.6
Released2023-08-092025-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked747

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—23.9%
Aider Polyglot—32.4%
SciCode—40.4%
WeirdML—37.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct—48.9%
LMArena Coding—1367
CadEval—16%
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—50.5%

Reasoning Claude Instant leads

Claude Instant: 19.6, GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
DTBench45.8%68.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28135.01
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—48.6%
ARC-AGI-1—3.5%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1349
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
LMCA—21.1%

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—6.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—44.7%
Omni-MATH—49.1%
LMArena Math—1343
MATH Level 5—87.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—4.5%
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
GPQA Diamond—65.8%
SimpleQA Verified—12.7%
MMLU-Pro—78.3%
GPQA (HELM)—61.4%
LMArena Expert—1338
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
LMArena Vision—1181

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
LMArena Non-English—1318
LMArena Chinese—1329
LMArena French—1358
LMArena German—1351
LMArena Japanese—1290
LMArena Korean—1298
LMArena Russian—1324
LMArena Spanish—1319

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
IFEval—90.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1333

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
Fiction.LiveBench—44.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1344

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGPT-4.1 mini
LMArena Text—1340
LMArena Creative Writing—1300
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1147
WildBench—83.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1354

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than GPT-4.1 mini?

GPT-4.1 mini has enough public results to be ranked (#240); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and GPT-4.1 mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.

Related comparisons

Go deeper