Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Wizardlm 70b
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 32.2.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Wizardlm 70b?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.