Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 37.6.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.538.1
Released2026-10-072025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$7.50
Results tracked925

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev15871275
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
LMArena Coding—1412
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1365

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1338

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1346
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Russian—1366
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1355

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1378

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1357
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper