Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3-4B
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-4B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 29.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.9% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 52.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | 52.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen3-4B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3-4B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.