Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen1.5-110B
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 33.7.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen1.5-110B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.