Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Phi-3.5-mini
Claude Haiku 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#52); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 49.2 to 34.6.
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Claude Haiku 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#52); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.