Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mistral Nemo
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 25.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.6% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 29.9% for Mistral Nemo.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.50 for Claude Haiku 5.5.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | 29.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Mistral Nemo?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 lists at $0.10 and $0.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Nemo share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.