Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 38.3.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.50 for Claude Haiku 5.5.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index49.541.3
Released2026-10-072025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$0.28
Results tracked921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena WebDev15871330
SciCode—25.9%
LMArena Coding—1443
ALE-Bench—737.95

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1420
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1396

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1425

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English—1392
LMArena Chinese—1462
LMArena French—1429
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1358
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1392

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1409

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text—1411
LMArena Creative Writing—1375
LMArena Multi-Turn—1404

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 lists at $0.10 and $0.50.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper