Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 36.8.
  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.50 for Claude Haiku 5.5.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index49.543.4
Released2026-10-072026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$0.28
Results tracked923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
LMArena WebDev15871438
SciCode—43.1%
LMArena Coding—1469
ALE-Bench—513.95

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
CritPt—3.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1450
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench—16%
LMArena Math—1436

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1460

Multimodal Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1247
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1468
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1421
LMArena Japanese—1306
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Russian—1395
LMArena Spanish—1416

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1434

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query—1445

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text—1428
LMArena Creative Writing—1393
LMArena Multi-Turn—1445

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than MiMo-V2.5?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 lists at $0.10 and $0.50.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper