Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Llama 13b
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 26.7.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Llama 13b?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Llama 13b better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Llama 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.