Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 31.4.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1249 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1240 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1247 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1251 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Granite 4.0 H Small: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 89% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1222 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1211 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1242 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.