Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 35.6.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.