Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 35.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1268 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1284 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1246 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1255 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.