Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.9% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1108 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1109 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| DTBench | — | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.04 |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 1.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | 34% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1059 |
| MMLU | — | 70% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1124 |
| LMArena French | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1119 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1139 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.