Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs ERNIE 5.1

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and ERNIE 5.1 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 40.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 65.7% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and ERNIE 5.1 specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
ProviderAnthropicBaidu
Noometry Index49.543.8
Released2026-10-07—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
LMArena WebDev1587—
LMArena Coding—1488

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, ERNIE 5.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
LMArena Search—1227

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%23.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1481
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1481

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1492

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), ERNIE 5.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
LMArena Non-English—1454
LMArena Chinese—1508
LMArena French—1488
LMArena German—1470
LMArena Japanese—1422
LMArena Korean—1427
LMArena Russian—1459
LMArena Spanish—1473

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1460

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
LMArena Longer Query—1462

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5ERNIE 5.1
LMArena Text—1468
LMArena Creative Writing—1441
LMArena Multi-Turn—1471

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than ERNIE 5.1?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and ERNIE 5.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper