Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

DeepSeek-V3.1 DeepSeek

42.8

Rank #108 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 38.9.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.95 for DeepSeek-V3.1.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 164K.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek-V3.1 specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Noometry Index49.542.8
Released2026-10-072025-08-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M164K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$0.95
Results tracked927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), DeepSeek-V3.1: 40.3 (#144)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena WebDev1587—
WeirdML—38.4%
LMArena Coding—1417

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.9 (#110)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
SimpleBench—40%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—53.2%
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1417
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
DTBench—82.7%
LMCA—24.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.92
ForecastBench—58

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), DeepSeek-V3.1: 38.9 (#122)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1420

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.7 (#90)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.5%
LMArena Expert—1405

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), DeepSeek-V3.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.6 (#106)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Non-English—1400
LMArena Chinese—1469
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1411
LMArena Japanese—1378
LMArena Korean—1337
LMArena Russian—1405
LMArena Spanish—1431

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, DeepSeek-V3.1: 73.9 (#110)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1400

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#232)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
Fiction.LiveBench—52.8%
LMArena Longer Query—1422

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.3 (#98)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.1
LMArena Text—1420
LMArena Creative Writing—1401
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1436
LMArena Multi-Turn—1408

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than DeepSeek-V3.1?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or DeepSeek-V3.1?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.1 lists at $0.25 and $0.95.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or DeepSeek-V3.1 better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 40.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek-V3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper