Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Solar Pro4 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 15.1.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $5 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 524K |
| Max output | 64K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 53 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1437 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 653.48 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 68.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | — |
| BALROG | 31.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 458.89 | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| DTBench | 73.6% | — |
| LMCA | 30.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.41 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1416 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 56.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1427 |
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | — |
Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1377 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1408 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1375 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1339 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1381 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1377 |
| IFEval | 80.1% | — |
Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1385 |
| WildBench | 83.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1064 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 lists at $1 and $5.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Solar Pro4 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.