Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 Plus in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 32.8 to 15.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 66.7% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $5 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 53 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 653.48 | 621.92 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 458.89 | 0.54 |
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 68.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | — |
| BALROG | 31.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | 22% |
| DTBench | 73.6% | 80.5% |
| LMCA | 30.9% | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.41 | 146.78 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.7% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.8% | 10.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1408 | — |
| LMArena German | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | — |
| WildBench | 83.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1064 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 lists at $1 and $5.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.