Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen1.5-72B

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.5

Rank #165 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 37.7 to 11.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 71.2% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 28.8% for Qwen1.5-72B.
  • Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.530.8
Released2025-10-152024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked5322

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Coding14531165
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%—
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
WeirdML45.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.3%
ALE-Bench653.48—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Qwen1.5-72B: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-72B leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts14201148
ARC-AGI-24%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
ARC-AGI-147.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
DTBench73.6%—
LMCA30.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.41—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math13961164
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
MATH Level 596.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
GPQA Diamond71.2%28.8%
LMArena Expert14421136
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Qwen1.5-72B: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English13771135
LMArena Chinese14171186
LMArena French14081159
LMArena German13751084
LMArena Japanese13391061
LMArena Korean13471050
LMArena Russian13811104
LMArena Spanish14201110

Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following14141141
IFEval80.1%—

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query14271157

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text13961166
LMArena Creative Writing13721137
LMArena Multi-Turn14091160
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen1.5-72B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper