Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen Turbo
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Haiku 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 44.9 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 66.7% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 6.1% for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $5 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 53 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 653.48 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 68.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | — |
| BALROG | 31.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 458.89 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
| DTBench | 73.6% | — |
| LMCA | 30.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.41 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.7% | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.4% | 56.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | 41.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1408 | — |
| LMArena German | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | — |
| WildBench | 83.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1064 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Qwen Turbo?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Haiku 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 lists at $1 and $5.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen Turbo share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.