Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Large 4 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Mistral Large 4 leads 22.5 to 15.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 14.3% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 27.4% for Mistral Large 4.
- Mistral Large 4 is cheaper at $0.68 / $2.09 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $5 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
- Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2026-10-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 64K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.68 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $2.09 |
| Results tracked | 53 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 4 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1541 |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1475 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 653.48 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Mistral Large 4: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 68.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | — |
| BALROG | 31.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 458.89 | — |
Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.3% | 27.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1444 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| DTBench | 73.6% | — |
| LMCA | 30.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.41 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1488 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 56.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | 20% |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1447 |
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Mistral Large 4: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | — |
Multilingual Mistral Large 4 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1377 | 1415 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1491 |
| LMArena Russian | 1381 | 1414 |
| LMArena French | 1408 | — |
| LMArena German | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Large 4 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1424 |
| IFEval | 80.1% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1429 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1424 |
| WildBench | 83.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1064 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.68 per million input tokens and $2.09 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 lists at $1 and $5.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Large 4 share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.