Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Magistral Medium

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.3

Rank #155 Confirmed

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 58.1 to 46.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 47.7% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 6.1% for Magistral Medium.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper at $1 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Magistral Medium specifications
Claude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index39.334.8
Released2025-10-152025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K128K
Max output64K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1$2
Output $ / M tokens$5$5
Results tracked5322

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.9 (#71), Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
SciCode43.3%39.2%
LMArena Coding14541319
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%—
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
WeirdML45.4%—
ALE-Bench653.48—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.5 (#50), Magistral Medium: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#310), Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
ARC-AGI-24%0%
ARC-AGI-147.7%6.1%
CritPt0%0.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14201267
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
DTBench73.6%—
LMCA30.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.42—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.0 (#69), Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
LMArena Math13951249
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
MATH Level 596.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.6 (#146), Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
LMArena Expert14431222
GPQA Diamond71.2%—
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 27.0 (#111), Magistral Medium: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 50.1 (#124), Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
LMArena Non-English13761232
LMArena Chinese14151225
LMArena French14081268
LMArena German13771248
LMArena Japanese13391176
LMArena Korean13461125
LMArena Russian13801224
LMArena Spanish14201269

Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.6 (#144), Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following14141254
IFEval80.1%—

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#86), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query14271295

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 58.1 (#119), Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Magistral Medium
LMArena Text13961255
LMArena Creative Writing13711245
LMArena Multi-Turn14091275
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Magistral Medium?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Magistral Medium?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5 does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Magistral Medium share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper