Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-4o

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 39 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.5

Rank #165 Confirmed

GPT-4o OpenAI

28.6

Rank #324 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 39 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 9 categories and GPT-4o in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 44.9 to 10.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 66.7% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 6.4% for GPT-4o.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper at $1 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for GPT-4o.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o specifications
Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index39.528.6
Released2025-10-152024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K128K
Max output64K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$5$10
Results tracked5372

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), GPT-4o: 24.8 (#328)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%21.6%
WeirdML45.4%25.1%
LMArena Coding14531297
SWE-bench Verified—31%
Aider Polyglot—45.3%
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
GSO—0%
BigCodeBench Instruct—51.1%
LiveBench Coding—51.4%
BigCodeBench Complete—61.1%
CadEval—26%
ALE-Bench653.48—
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—72.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), GPT-4o: 21.0 (#141)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
BALROG31.2%32.3%
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
GDPval—9.9%
TheAgentCompany—8.6%
Cybench—12.5%
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
LMArena Search—1006
METR Time Horizons—40.8%
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), GPT-4o: 9.4 (#343)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
ARC-AGI-24%0%
ARC-AGI-147.7%4.5%
CritPt0%0%
Chess Puzzles8%13%
LMArena Hard Prompts14201281
DTBench73.6%64.5%
LMCA30.9%16.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index142.41128.97
ForecastBench61.457.7
SimpleBench—17.8%
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LiveBench Reasoning—55.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—60.9%
LiveBench—55.3%

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), GPT-4o: 10.6 (#312)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%6.4%
Omni-MATH56.1%29.3%
LMArena Math13961285
MATH Level 596.4%53.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%0.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—0.4%
LiveBench Math—49.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), GPT-4o: 28.8 (#242)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
GPQA Diamond71.2%49.2%
SimpleQA Verified13.2%26%
MMLU-Pro77.7%71.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%9.6%
GPQA (HELM)60.5%52%
LMArena Expert14421250
Humanity's Last Exam—2.7%
Confabulations—15.3%
MMLU—88.1%

Multimodal GPT-4o leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), GPT-4o: 34.5 (#91)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
LMArena Vision—1137
Video-MME—71.9%
GeoBench—71%
VPCT—40%
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—
ScienceQA—88.5%

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), GPT-4o: 43.2 (#186)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
LMArena Non-English13771283
LMArena Chinese14171277
LMArena French14081304
LMArena German13751282
LMArena Japanese13391257
LMArena Korean13471234
LMArena Russian13811286
LMArena Spanish14201292

Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), GPT-4o: 66.6 (#207)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
IFEval80.1%81.7%
LMArena Instruction Following14141278
LiveBench Instruction Following—68.6%

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), GPT-4o: 39.4 (#179)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
LMArena Longer Query14271289
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), GPT-4o: 52.6 (#166)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o
LMArena Text13961300
LMArena Creative Writing13721292
WildBench83.9%82.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn14091302
Short-Story Creative Writing—81.8%
EQ-Bench 41064—
LiveBench Language—47.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than GPT-4o?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-4o?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; GPT-4o lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-4o better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 24.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5 does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o share?

39 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4o has 72.

Related comparisons

Go deeper