Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.5V

Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-4.5V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.5

Rank #165 Confirmed

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.8

Rank #158 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.5V in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5V leads 27.4 to 15.1.
  • GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $5 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 64K.
  • GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index39.539.8
Released2025-10-152025-08-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K64K
Max output64K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1$0.60
Output $ / M tokens$5$1.80
Results tracked5315

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Coding14531347
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%—
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
WeirdML45.4%—
ALE-Bench653.48—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), GLM-4.5V: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Hard Prompts14201334
ARC-AGI-24%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—59.8%
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
ARC-AGI-147.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
DTBench73.6%—
LMCA30.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.41—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Math13961354
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
MATH Level 596.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Expert14421353
GPQA Diamond71.2%—
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—

Multimodal GLM-4.5V leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Vision—1154
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Non-English13771303
LMArena Chinese14171337
LMArena Russian13811298
LMArena Spanish14201336
LMArena French1408—
LMArena German1375—
LMArena Japanese1339—
LMArena Korean1347—

Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Instruction Following14141311
IFEval80.1%—

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Longer Query14271304

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM-4.5V
LMArena Text13961333
LMArena Creative Writing13721295
LMArena Multi-Turn14091332
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than GLM-4.5V?

Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-4.5V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 lists at $1 and $5.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5 does, with 200K tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-4.5V share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper