Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command R+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.5

Rank #165 Confirmed

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Command R+ in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 44.9 to 28.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 30.9% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 5% for Command R+.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper at $1 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5Command R+
ProviderAnthropicCohere
Noometry Index39.532.4
Released2025-10-152024-08-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K128K
Max output64K4K
Input $ / M tokens$1$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$5$10
Results tracked5334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Command R+: 29.1 (#309)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
LMArena Coding14531187
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%—
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
WeirdML45.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.8%
LiveBench Coding—19.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—41.9%
ALE-Bench653.48—
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—63.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Command R+: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Command R+: 9.2 (#344)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
LMArena Hard Prompts14201186
DTBench73.6%54.9%
LMCA30.9%5%
Epoch Capabilities Index142.41119.34
ARC-AGI-24%—
SimpleBench—17.4%
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
ARC-AGI-147.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
LiveBench Reasoning—24.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—38.1%
ForecastBench61.4—
LiveBench—31.8%

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Command R+: 28.9 (#242)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
LMArena Math13961188
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
LiveBench Math—21.3%
MATH Level 596.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Command R+: 36.4 (#169)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%6.9%
LMArena Expert14421174
GPQA Diamond71.2%—
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—
MMLU—69.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Command R+: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Command R+: 38.6 (#227)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
LMArena Non-English13771216
LMArena Chinese14171226
LMArena French14081209
LMArena German13751216
LMArena Japanese13391166
LMArena Korean13471138
LMArena Russian13811227
LMArena Spanish14201189

Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Command R+: 60.0 (#254)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
LMArena Instruction Following14141197
LiveBench Instruction Following—57.6%
IFEval80.1%—

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Command R+: 37.3 (#219)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
LMArena Longer Query14271230

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Command R+: 43.5 (#228)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command R+
LMArena Text13961229
LMArena Creative Writing13721235
LMArena Multi-Turn14091213
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—
LiveBench Language—29.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Command R+?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command R+?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command R+ better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5 does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command R+ share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Command R+ has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper