Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

Claude Fable 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#5); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

66.8

Rank #5 Confirmed

WizardLM-2 8x22B Microsoft

31.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Fable 5 scores higher in 2 categories and WizardLM-2 8x22B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5 leads 88.5 to 28.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 85.9% for Claude Fable 5 and 43.4% for WizardLM-2 8x22B.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper at $0.62 / $0.62 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.
  • Claude Fable 5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 66K.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index66.831.4
Released2026-06-072024-04-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M66K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$10$0.62
Output $ / M tokens$50$0.62
Results tracked622

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 70.6 (#4), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
DeepSWE69.9%—
FrontierCode53.5%—
LMArena WebDev1625—
FrontierSWE47%—
SciCode61%—
GSO78.4%—
WeirdML91.9%—
LMArena Coding1519—
MirrorCode63.9%—
ALE-Bench2,041—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 54.0 (#2), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
APEX-Agents63.6%—
Remote Labor Index16.1%—
τ²-bench Banking39.7%—
PostTrainBench41.8%—
GBAEval74.5%—
GDP.pdf30%—
LMArena Search1230—
Vending-Bench 25,680—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#6), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
ARC-AGI-289.2%—
SimpleBench81.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.7%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt28.6%—
Chess Puzzles41%—
EnigmaEval39.3%—
EBR-Bench39.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1508—
Mystery Game Puzzles52%—
DTBench98.4%—
LMCA61.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Bench to the Future 30.13—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.06—

Math Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 88.5 (#5), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 28.9

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87%—
FrontierMath Tier 490.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench95%—
LMArena Math1519—
MATH Level 5—25.7%
FrontierMath Erdős0%—

Knowledge Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 62.2 (#25), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 23.3

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
GPQA Diamond85.9%43.4%
SimpleQA Verified70.7%—
LMArena Expert1534—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 45.3 (#17), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Vision1324—
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly35.8%—
LMArena Document1496—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 57.3 (#9), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Non-English1481—
LMArena Chinese1543—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1486—
LMArena Japanese1506—
LMArena Korean1488—
LMArena Russian1504—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 78.6 (#8), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following1502—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#23), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query1509—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 75.9 (#5), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5WizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Text1491—
LMArena Creative Writing1494—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1943—
EQ-Bench 41340—
LMArena Multi-Turn1504—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than WizardLM-2 8x22B?

Claude Fable 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#5); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or WizardLM-2 8x22B?

WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.62 per million input tokens and $0.62 per million output tokens; Claude Fable 5 lists at $10 and $50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5 does, with 1M tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5 and WizardLM-2 8x22B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Fable 5 has 62 scored results on Noometry and WizardLM-2 8x22B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper