Model comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs o1-mini
Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5 scores higher in 9 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Fable 5 leads 76.8 to 8.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 89.2% for Claude Fable 5 and 0.8% for o1-mini.
Side by side
| Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 66.8 | 34.0 |
| Released | 2026-06-07 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $50 | — |
| Results tracked | 62 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 70.6 (#4), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 91.9% | 36.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1519 | 1362 |
| DeepSWE | 69.9% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1625 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 47% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| GSO | 78.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| MirrorCode | 63.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,041 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 54.0 (#2), o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 63.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 39.7% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| PostTrainBench | 41.8% | — |
| GBAEval | 74.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1230 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,680 | — |
Reasoning Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#6), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | 81.9% | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | 14% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1333 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.06 | 135.82 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.7% | — |
| CritPt | 28.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 41% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 39.3% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 39.5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 52% | — |
| DTBench | 98.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | 61.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 95% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.13 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 88.5 (#5), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 46.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1519 | 1358 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 90.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 95% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 62.2 (#25), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | 62.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1534 | 1316 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Fable 5: 45.3 (#17), o1-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1324 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 35.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1496 | — |
Multilingual Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 57.3 (#9), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1481 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1543 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1505 | 1293 |
| LMArena German | 1486 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1506 | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | 1488 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 1504 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1498 | 1303 |
Instruction Following Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 78.6 (#8), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1502 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#23), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1509 | 1320 |
Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 75.9 (#5), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1494 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1504 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1943 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1340 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than o1-mini?
Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Fable 5 or o1-mini better for coding?
Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 70.6 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5 and o1-mini share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5 has 62 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.