Model comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)
Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5 scores higher in 10 categories and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Fable 5 leads 76.8 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 89.2% for Claude Fable 5 and 0.8% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024).
Side by side
| Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 66.8 | 32.1 |
| Released | 2026-06-07 | 2024-02-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $50 | — |
| Results tracked | 62 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 70.6 (#4), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 91.9% | 22.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1519 | 1294 |
| DeepSWE | 69.9% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1625 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 47% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| GSO | 78.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.8% |
| MirrorCode | 63.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.5% |
| CadEval | — | 34% |
| ALE-Bench | 2,041 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 79.3% |
| MBPP+ | — | 74.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 54.0 (#2), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 63.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 3.4% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 39.7% | — |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
| PostTrainBench | 41.8% | — |
| BALROG | — | 21% |
| GBAEval | 74.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1230 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,680 | — |
Reasoning Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#6), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | 81.9% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1296 |
| DTBench | 98.4% | 59% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.06 | 131.73 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 28.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 41% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 39.3% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 39.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 52% | — |
| LMCA | 61.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 95% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.13 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 89.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.4 |
Math Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 88.5 (#5), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 23.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1519 | 1315 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 90.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 95% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 36.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70.4% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 62.2 (#25), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | 57.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1534 | 1279 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 13.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 53.4% |
| MMLU | — | 86.9% |
Multimodal Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 45.3 (#17), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1324 | 1161 |
| Video-MME | — | 75% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 35.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1496 | — |
Multilingual Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 57.3 (#9), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1481 | 1312 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1543 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | 1505 | 1302 |
| LMArena German | 1486 | 1286 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1506 | 1292 |
| LMArena Korean | 1488 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1504 | 1320 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1498 | 1311 |
Instruction Following Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 78.6 (#8), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1502 | 1297 |
| IFEval | — | 83.7% |
Long Context Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#23), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1509 | 1308 |
Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5 leads
Claude Fable 5: 75.9 (#5), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1494 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1504 | 1296 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1943 | — |
| WildBench | — | 81.3% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1340 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)?
Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better for coding?
Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 70.6 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5 has 62 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45.