Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs DBRX

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

66.8

Rank #5 Confirmed

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5 scores higher in 8 categories and DBRX in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5 leads 88.5 to 24.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 85.9% for Claude Fable 5 and 32.9% for DBRX.
  • DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Fable 5DBRX
ProviderAnthropicDatabricks
Noometry Index66.829.4
Released2026-06-072024-03-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$50—
Results tracked6221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 70.6 (#4), DBRX: 32.9 (#266)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
LMArena Coding15191132
DeepSWE69.9%—
FrontierCode53.5%—
LMArena WebDev1625—
FrontierSWE47%—
SciCode61%—
GSO78.4%—
WeirdML91.9%—
MirrorCode63.9%—
ALE-Bench2,041—
HumanEval+—70.1%
MBPP+—55.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 54.0 (#2), DBRX: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
APEX-Agents63.6%—
Remote Labor Index16.1%—
τ²-bench Banking39.7%—
PostTrainBench41.8%—
GBAEval74.5%—
GDP.pdf30%—
LMArena Search1230—
Vending-Bench 25,680—

Reasoning Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#6), DBRX: 21.4 (#222)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
LMArena Hard Prompts15081113
ARC-AGI-289.2%—
SimpleBench81.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.7%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt28.6%—
Chess Puzzles41%—
EnigmaEval39.3%—
EBR-Bench39.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles52%—
DTBench98.4%—
LMCA61.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Bench to the Future 30.13—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.06—

Math Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 88.5 (#5), DBRX: 24.3 (#269)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
LMArena Math15191145
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87%—
FrontierMath Tier 490.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench95%—
MATH Level 5—11.7%
FrontierMath Erdős0%—

Knowledge Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 62.2 (#25), DBRX: 14.9 (#294)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
GPQA Diamond85.9%32.9%
LMArena Expert15341076
SimpleQA Verified70.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 45.3 (#17), DBRX: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
LMArena Vision1324—
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly35.8%—
LMArena Document1496—

Multilingual Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 57.3 (#9), DBRX: 29.3 (#268)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
LMArena Non-English14811071
LMArena Chinese15431068
LMArena French15051096
LMArena German14861057
LMArena Japanese1506990
LMArena Korean1488993
LMArena Russian15041078
LMArena Spanish14981064

Instruction Following Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 78.6 (#8), DBRX: 57.5 (#270)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
LMArena Instruction Following15021112

Long Context Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#23), DBRX: 33.7 (#258)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
LMArena Longer Query15091112

Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 75.9 (#5), DBRX: 33.6 (#275)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5DBRX
LMArena Text14911119
LMArena Creative Writing14941104
LMArena Multi-Turn15041111
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1943—
EQ-Bench 41340—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than DBRX?

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Fable 5 or DBRX better for coding?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 70.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5 and DBRX share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5 has 62 scored results on Noometry and DBRX has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper