Model comparison
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Reka Flash 3
Claude Fable 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#2); Reka Flash 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Reka Flash 3 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 79.3 to 43.8.
- Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1.
- Claude Fable 5.1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 66K.
- Reka Flash 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Reka |
| Noometry Index | 68.5 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2025-03-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 66K |
| Max output | 128K | 59K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $50 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 50 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 70.5 (#2), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | — |
| CursorBench | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1753 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | — |
| SciCode | 63.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1523 | — |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,143 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 50.8 (#5), Reka Flash 3: 30.1
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | — |
| BALROG | — | 29.2% |
| GDP.pdf | 29.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,422 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#5), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 58% | — |
| DTBench | 97.6% | — |
| LMCA | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 89.5 (#3), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 90.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 87.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1519 | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 69.3 (#5), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1528 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 54.1 (#4), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1319 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 41.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 70% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1513 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 59.5 (#2), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1509 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1589 | — |
| LMArena French | 1532 | — |
| LMArena German | 1495 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1565 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1525 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1503 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 79.3 (#6), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1515 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 46.8 (#19), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1524 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 79.3 (#1), Reka Flash 3: 43.8
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2162 | 1228 |
| LMArena Text | 1511 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1507 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1492 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Reka Flash 3?
Claude Fable 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#2); Reka Flash 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Reka Flash 3?
Reka Flash 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Claude Fable 5.1 lists at $10 and $50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Fable 5.1 does, with 1M tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and Reka Flash 3 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 50 scored results on Noometry and Reka Flash 3 has 2.