Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 33.6 to 10.0.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Claude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderAnthropicStepFun
Noometry Index28.838.6
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3012

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding12231316
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts11971299
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math12131305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert11731279
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English12051290
LMArena Chinese11881331
LMArena Russian12271324
LMArena French1228—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following12001287

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query12111307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text12181321
LMArena Creative Writing11861328
LMArena Multi-Turn12271292

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper