Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs StarCoder 2 15B

Claude 3 Sonnet has enough public results to be ranked (#319); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 15B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 15B leads 36.6 to 29.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 53.8% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 38.4% for StarCoder 2 15B.
  • StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and StarCoder 2 15B specifications
Claude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
ProviderAnthropicNVIDIA
Noometry Index29.038.1
Released2024-02-292024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked307

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding StarCoder 2 15B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%38.4%
HumanEval+64%37.8%
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
LMArena Coding1223—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7105
WinoGrande75.1%64.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1197—
DTBench53.6%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
MMLU75.9%64.1%
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1173—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Non-English1205—
LMArena Chinese1189—
LMArena French1229—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Instruction Following1199—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Longer Query1211—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1186—
LMArena Multi-Turn1227—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than StarCoder 2 15B?

Claude 3 Sonnet has enough public results to be ranked (#319); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

StarCoder 2 15B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and StarCoder 2 15B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper