Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

Qwen3 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #83 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 235B-A22B leads 48.5 to 10.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 86.7% for Qwen3 235B-A22B.
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen3 235B-A22B specifications
Claude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.843.2
Released2024-02-292025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked3049

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 43.8 (#72)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
WeirdML10.2%41%
LMArena Coding12231445
Aider Polyglot—59.6%
SciCode—42.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.7 (#48)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—52.1%
Vending-Bench 2—-11.34

Reasoning Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.8 (#302)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts11971433
DTBench53.6%80.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69143.87
ARC-AGI-2—1.3%
SimpleBench—31%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—69.4%
ARC-AGI-1—11%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
LMCA—29.3%
ForecastBench—59.7
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 48.5 (#51)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%86.7%
LMArena Math12131431
MATH Level 518.2%68.9%
Omni-MATH—71.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.5 (#67)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
GPQA Diamond40.6%80.1%
LMArena Expert11731460
SimpleQA Verified—40.4%
MMLU-Pro—84.4%
Confabulations—15.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), Qwen3 235B-A22B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.5 (#84)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English12051410
LMArena Chinese11881481
LMArena French12281445
LMArena German12041432
LMArena Japanese11311400
LMArena Korean11281391
LMArena Russian12271411
LMArena Spanish12041429

Instruction Following Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.8 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following12001408
IFEval—83.5%

Long Context Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#25)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query12111426
Fiction.LiveBench—75%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.8 (#103)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Text12181419
LMArena Creative Writing11861384
LMArena Multi-Turn12271432
Short-Story Creative Writing—83%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1366
WildBench—86.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper