Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Claude 3 Sonnet has enough public results to be ranked (#319); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 29.6.
  • Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct specifications
Claude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.038.7
Released2024-02-292024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$1.40
Results tracked303

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%39.8%
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%52.2%
WeirdML10.2%—
LMArena Coding1223—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1197—
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
MMLU75.9%79.9%
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1173—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1205—
LMArena Chinese1189—
LMArena French1229—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1199—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1211—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1186—
LMArena Multi-Turn1227—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Claude 3 Sonnet has enough public results to be ranked (#319); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper