Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen Max

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen Max leads 22.3 to 10.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 18.2% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 67.2% for Qwen Max.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen Max specifications
Claude 3 SonnetQwen Max
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.034.7
Released2024-02-292024-04-03
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—33K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.60
Output $ / M tokens—$6.40
Results tracked3023

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Max leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
LMArena Coding12231288
Aider Polyglot—21.8%
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Qwen Max leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
LMArena Hard Prompts11971269
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Qwen Max leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%16.1%
LMArena Math12131275
MATH Level 518.2%67.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1%

Knowledge Qwen Max leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
GPQA Diamond40.6%56.1%
LMArena Expert11731248
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Qwen Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Qwen Max leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
LMArena Non-English12051263
LMArena Chinese11891254
LMArena French12291330
LMArena German12041254
LMArena Japanese11311205
LMArena Korean11281142
LMArena Russian12271274
LMArena Spanish12041290

Instruction Following Qwen Max leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
LMArena Instruction Following11991262

Long Context Qwen Max leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
LMArena Longer Query12111288
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Qwen Max leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen Max
LMArena Text12181282
LMArena Creative Writing11861248
LMArena Multi-Turn12271277

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen Max better for coding?

Qwen Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper