Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Magistral Small

Magistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Small in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Small leads 26.2 to 10.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 30% for Magistral Small.
  • Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Magistral Small specifications
Claude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index29.030.2
Released2024-02-292025-06-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—40K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$1.50
Results tracked3010

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Small leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
SciCode—35.2%
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
LMArena Coding1223—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
DTBench53.6%61.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7133.19
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—6.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1197—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Magistral Small leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%30%
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Magistral Small leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
GPQA Diamond40.6%56.1%
LMArena Expert1173—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Magistral Small: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Magistral Small: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
LMArena Non-English1205—
LMArena Chinese1189—
LMArena French1229—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Magistral Small: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following1199—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Magistral Small: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
LMArena Longer Query1211—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Magistral Small: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMagistral Small
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1186—
LMArena Multi-Turn1227—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Magistral Small?

Magistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Magistral Small better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Magistral Small share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper