Model comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 42.1.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 1418 |
| WeirdML | 10.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 64% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.3% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1197 | 1416 |
| DTBench | 53.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.7 | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1213 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 18.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1173 | — |
| MMLU | 75.9% | — |
Multimodal Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 984 | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1189 | — |
| LMArena French | 1229 | — |
| LMArena German | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1204 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1397 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1211 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.